
Guide / Choosing a tool
The best tool is the one that matches how you collect traces, what you need to see and where your data has to live. Here is how to choose, and who each option fits.
How to choose
01
Look for OpenTelemetry support so your instrumentation is not locked to one vendor.
02
An agent makes many model and tool calls per task. You want them in one trace, in order.
03
Cost per run and per task matters more than the monthly total.
04
Tracing tells you what happened. Evaluation and alerts tell you what to fix first.
05
Check hosting options, such as an EU region or self-hosting, before you commit.
The options
We make Tracify, so read this with that in mind. Descriptions of other tools are short summaries; check their sites for current features and pricing.
| Tool | Best when you | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Tracify | Run agents and want managed tracing, cost, alerts and evaluation, with an EU region. | Trace viewer |
| Langfuse | You want to read, modify or self-host the source. | Tracify vs Langfuse |
| LangSmith | Your stack is mostly LangChain or LangGraph. | Tracify vs LangSmith |
| Helicone | You want a gateway in front of providers for routing and fallbacks. | Tracify vs Helicone |
| Arize Phoenix | You want a free tool you run yourself, with the source available. | Tracify vs Arize Phoenix |
| Braintrust | Evaluation and experiment workflows are your top priority. | Tracify vs Braintrust |
| Datadog LLM Observability | Your whole company already runs on Datadog and wants one pane of glass. | Tracify vs Datadog LLM Observability |
Questions
Next: what is LLM observability, send OpenTelemetry traces, pricing.
